<== you are here

Supporting the Bend of an L over FCP from a Tower
Slanted Vertical Wire from Tower Support to FCP
Use this method for towers 60 feet (18m) and lower.

This design reduces RF losses in the tower base and close dirt surroundings by emphasizing the Inverted L's vertical wire coupling to the top portion of the tower while reducing coupling to the lower portion. This non-constant coupling minimizes current everywhere in the tower, including the tower base. The vertical wire is supported three feet (1 m) from the tower at the top and then slopes down to the FCP with its center 13 to 15 feet (4.5-5m) from the tower. The FCP is at a minimum 10 feet (3 m) above ground.

The various orientations of the L's horizontal wire to the slanted vertical wire have only mildly different patterns. So the orientation of the horizontal wire should be chosen to avoid loss list issues in your situation, e.g. placing weak direction of the L for your operation and/or avoiding trees inside the bend.

The NEC 4.2 model to the left displays the tower current without the slanted vertical wir. Instead the vertical wire mounted 3 feet (1m) from the tower all way. The tower current is highlighted. Note that there is far more total (integrated) current in the tower than the L. At the bottom of the tower the RF current is 4.5 amps at 1500 watts, the highest current anywhere in the antenna wires and tower, and those 4.5 amps are being driven into lossy ground. This is true even though there is no direct RF drive to the tower.

The NEC 4.2 model below left displays the tower current with the slanted L vertical wire. The tower current again is highlighted. Note that the amount of overall tower current is significantly reduced. Especially reduced is the current at the base of the tower being driven into the ground. The tower current at the ground is 1.7 amps at 1500 watts. The absolute value of the loss at the base of the tower will depend on the effective RF series loss at the base. Without the slanted vertical the power loss will be seven times the loss with the slanted vertical, the square of 4.5/1.7.

This design supports 80/160 dual banding.

Table: Results by Tower Height for Short-to-Tower and Slanting Vertical Methods

Data below shows the shorting wire heights for various horizontal wire and tower heights. At lower heights in the table, data for the slanting vertical method demonstrates where the two methods overlap and deteriorate in the other's range. The mechanisms creating this crossover point are not clearly understood.

The horizontal (or horizontal wire plus drooper wire) is always 88 feet in this table. This technique optimizes low angle results by keeping RF current dense up high on the vertical wire. See for further details.

Figures are from NEC 4.2 modeling over "average" ground. For reference, a 1/4 wave vertical over USA FCC specified commercial radial system (120 times buried AWG 4 copper 0.4 wavelength buried radials) in "average" ground produces 1.18 dBi gain.

Tower L Horiz Shorting Shorting Slanting
Height Wire Ht Wire Ht Max Gain Max Gain
--Ft-(m)-- --Ft-(m)-- --Ft-(m)-- dBi@Elev dBi@Elev
120 (36.6) 100 (30.5) 74 (22.6) +0.16@24 ----------
110 (33.5) 90 (27.4) 62 (18.9) +0.03@25 ----------
100 (30.5) 80 (21.3) 57 (17.4) -0.11@25 ----------
90 (27.4) 70 (21.3) 51 (15.5)) -0.18@26 ----------
80 (24.4) 70 (21.3) 44 (13.4) -0.39@27 ----------
70 (21.3) 70 (21.3) 39 (11.9) -0.40@29 -0.92@24
65 (19.8) 65 (19.8) 32 (9.8) -0.56@29 -0.76@25
60 (18.3) 60 (18.3) 28 (8.5) -0.89@29 -0.75@26
55 (16.8) 55 (16.8) 23 (7.0) -1.20@29 -0.86@27
50 (15.2) 50 (15.2) ---------- ---------- -1.05@28

Use your Back Button to Return to the Prior Page